911:Political trap

From Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Site menu:


“Politics offers yesterday’s answers to today’s questions” - Marshall Mcluhan
“It doesn't matter who the people voted for, they always vote for us” - Joseph Stalin
“Hypocrisy trumps democracy” - J. S. Hirschhorn
“After decades of lesser-evil voting I found my inner conscience and commitment to political dissent, to what I call progressive civil disobedience.” - J. S. Hirschhorn

Contents

Intro

Government should never be trusted, it should always be seen with a cynical and realistic eye. The constitution and extended laws to keep its balance in check should be made from that point of view. Once the government oversteps its contract, it (the people/institutions involved) should be punished and pay reparations.

The media focus on Bush & Co is not just tiring, but also counterproductive, because a regime change won't really change the fundamentals. The forces against democratic influence in the US are now so great, that the recovery of true democratic influence can't simply be done via the traditional political parties.

Examples of these fascistic forces in the US:

  • Rigged voting systems.
  • The ever growing military industrial complex.
  • Corrupt inner cores within the Republican and the Democratic party.
  • The private Federal Reserve stealing income wealth, leading to: debt, financial slavery and ulimately poverty and violence.
  • Total media control and ambient mainstream media propaganda by a small group of corporate elites and governement representatives.
  • Secret societies influencing national and international political agenda's and actions.
  • Corrupt and biased think-tanks/lobbyists authoring governmental policies and legislation.
  • The stock market money robbing/laundering, and the corrupt monitoring by the SEC.

Besides the awareness among voters about the current political state of the US, fresh political options (decentralization, smaller government, more community/volunteer participation, etc.) and better representational systems need to be used to recover the loss of democracy. What is also needed is to focus a bit more on the financial side (such as central banking/pension/stock/gov-budget fraud and corruption), because this is the energy which feed these neo-fascistic networks.

Please don't fall into the trap of labeling people and actions as simply "republican", "democrat", "conservative", "liberal", "terrorist", "communist", "patriot", "conspiracy theorist", without further thought. Otherwise these terms do no justice to the underlying facts, which can be acts of violence, greed, and injustice (or simply the opposite). The "neo-con" label is simply just an euphemism for modern Fascism.

When one starts using the word "bipartisan", you are playing into the hands of the controlling elite (think about that!). We must educate people about the subtle trap which has been set. The US political landscape (and most europeans) consisting of two main parties is almost completely gamed in favor of the fascistic structures. Eg. several US presidents and potential candidates are members of the secret, moloch worshiping, Skull and Bones society. These influential politicians are selected based on their value for furthering the goals of their international fascistic network.

Don't expect any important changes to be made by the Democrats or the Republicans, to prevent further escalation of fascism in the US. The higher echelons of those parties won't let that happen. If change does happen, they will strongly fight the persons responsible for it (see the JFK assassination, and many other similar cases). Change will only happen by large scale grassroot efforts by the people. The effectiveness of these grassroot efforts will depend upon the sustained, well coordinated, and - most importantly - well educated approach of people.

See also:

Masonic take-over

  • todo: socialism, communism, nazism, ... (as governmental take-overs)
    • Robert Welch Speech 1974 [5]
    • research the influence of suspicious groups (Vatican/Jesuits, big corporations, ...)
  • todo: neo-conservatism, are corporate/Illuminati take-overs of government
    • example: United States
    • Left Vs Right Paradigm
      • When one takes the time to research the "liberal elite," whom the conservatives oppose, and the "conservative elite," whom the liberals oppose, one finds both "elite" are one and the same. "Liberal" or "Conservative" is not a substantive choice, it is only the carefully crafted illusion of a choice, for both parties come together when they are instructed to.
  • common elements: (constitutional) law changes, desire for total media control, false-flag operations, lies, propaganda, human-rights abuse, military spending increase, ...
  • differences:
    • corporate take-overs can utilize the monetary system to force subversive changes in society (media censorship through media owner ship, labor structures, taxation, inflation, ...)
    • government / political-party take-overs instead make more use of (legalized) physical force (threats, violence, detainment, torture, murder) XXX
  • Covert take overs
    • Control is exerted through "news items" and propaganda from pro-establishment organizations like:
      • The American Medical Association
        • It was attempted in England against Homeopathy, but it failed due to the personal intervention of the Royal Family who had received much relief and healing at the hands of Homeopathic healers in the 19th century. By the way, the AMA was found guilty of conspiracy against chiropractors in 1987 by a federal judge and fined a couple of million dollars. Here in America, a relentless campaign of misinformation, fraud, deception, and suppression of alternative therapies and healers has been in place for the better part of this century in order to keep highly effective alternative therapies from reaching any significant plateau of public awareness. [6]
      • The American Cancer Society
      • The Diabetes Foundation, etc.
      • local medical boards
    • government agencies like:

Controlled Opposition

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin [10]

todo

  • Larouche Pac
  • JBS society
  • Right Vs Left
  • Liberals Vs Conservatives


  • Democrats Vs Republicans


Philantropy

Funding

Funding of the "The Gatekeepers of the So-Called Left" [3]
  • In his shocking investigative report "The Left Gatekeepers", journalist Bob Feldman researched purportedly "Left" activist and media organizations that receive substantial funding from large establishment foundations with known ties to the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and even the much-maligned Carlyle Group, the arms dealing "investment fund" featured in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, of which GHW Bush, the Saudi royal family, and, at one time, the Bin Laden family, are all equity partners. The Foundation structure is used by these organizations to funnel corporate and personal wealth into the policy-making process. Foundations are tax-free, and contributions to foundations are deductible from federal corporate and individual income taxes. The Foundations themselves are not subject to federal income taxation, and they control hundreds of billions of dollars of money that would normally go to pay these necessary taxes. Feldman asks, "Are the interests of the people being served by 'dissidents' who are being subsidized by the agencies of the ruling class whom they should be exposing? What does this say about the motivations behind the Left establishment's ideological warfare against conspiracy researchers, and their adoption of an increasingly watered-down analytical view which fails to look closely at the inner power structures and conspiracies of the ruling elite?" - The Gatekeepers of the So-Called Left

Also see:

Warfare

"Why, of course, the people don't want war, why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.....voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." - Herman Goering during the Nuremberg Trials [11]
"The organizing principle of any society is for war. The basic authority of a modern state over its people resides in its war powers. . . . War readiness accounts for approximately a tenth of the output of the world's total economy" - Extract from the movie JFK
"Let us keep in mind that all people of all countries want peace, only their governments want war." - Dwight D. Eisenhower [12]

The Report from Iron Mountain

  • “Iron Mountain – A Blueprint For Tyranny.” It discusses a Top Secret study commissioned in 1961 by JFK to determine the problems facing the USA if we moved from a war footing to peace. The report was finished in 1966 and LBJ ordered that it never be released. One of the participants writing the study decided to release it anyway. It was published by The Dial Press, Inc. 1967, New York, Library of Congress Catalog card Number 67-27553. The document reports upon bringing the USA and the world under the control of the UN. This blueprint is now being implemented without our knowledge or consent. [13]
  • video: Iron Mountain – A Blueprint For Tyranny


Terrosrism

Todo: Al-Qaeda

  • ISIS
    • Islamic State was born in NATO camps
    • 'The Terrorists R Us.' The Islamic State 'Big Lie'
      • What is not mentioned in the media reports is that the heads of State and heads of government who have endorsed America’s campaign against the Islamic State, advised by their respective secret services, are fully aware that US intelligence is the unspoken architect of the Islamic State, which is part of a vast network of US supported “jihadist” terrorist entities. Countries are either coerced into supporting the US sponsored resolution or they are complicit in the US terror agenda. Lest we forget, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, have been financing and training the ISIL terrorists on behalf of the United States. Israel is harboring the Islamic State (ISIL) in the Golan Heights, NATO in liaison with the Turkish high command has since March 2011 been involved in coordinating the recruitment of the jihadist fighters dispatched to Syria. Moreover, the ISIL brigades in both Syria and Iraq are integrated by Western special forces and military advisers. All this is known and documented, yet not a single head of state or head of government has had the courage to point to the absurdity of the US sponsored United Nations Security Council resolution, which was adopted unanimously on September 24.... The forbidden truth is that the US is involved in a diabolical undertaking: it has created an Islamic terror network with a view to destroying sovereign countries and now it is waging a war against its own terror network. Without media propaganda, this military agenda under the guise of counter-terrorism would fall flat, collapse like a deck of cards.

Examples of NWO fronts

Occupy Wall Street

Same pamphlets in Ukraine handed out during protests in Egypt: US NGO Uncovered [4]



Occupy Hong Kong

Links

Personal tools